﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">scholix</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group>
      <publisher><publisher-name>Scholix Publishers</publisher-name></publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">111</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.61148/JMBS/early-detection-of-genetic-oculo-auditory-syndromes--a-systematic-review</article-id>
      <title-group><article-title>Early Detection of Genetic Oculo-Auditory Syndromes -A Systematic Review</article-title></title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author"><name><string-name>Dr. Ragni Kumari</string-name></name></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author"><name><string-name>PhD</string-name></name></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author"><name><string-name>M. Optom</string-name></name></contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>16</day><month>10</month><year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <abstract><p>Objective: To evaluate community-based screening strategies for the early detection of genetically linked oculo-auditory syndromes, particularly Usher syndrome.
Data Sources: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar (2010–2026).
Review Methods: PRISMA-guided systematic review of observational studies evaluating hearing screening, genetic testing, and community-based detection strategies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.
Results: Fourteen studies involving 342 participants were included. Universal newborn hearing screening effectively identified congenital hearing loss but did not reliably detect syndromic disorders with delayed ocular manifestations. Integration of molecular genetic testing improved diagnostic yield, enabled earlier diagnosis, and supported timely referral for ophthalmic evaluation and genetic counselling. Community-based and mobile health programmes improved access to screening services.
Conclusion: Combining newborn hearing screening with molecular genetic testing and multidisciplinary referral pathways may reduce diagnostic delay and improve management of genetically linked oculo-auditory syndromes.
</p></abstract>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright &#169; 2026 Scholix Publishers</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license>
      </permissions>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body><p>Congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is one of the most common permanent sensory disorders identified during infancy, with an estimated global incidence of 1–3 per 1,000 live births (1). Approximately 50–60% of congenital hearing loss has a genetic basis and is broadly classified into no syndromic and syndromic forms. Among the syndromic disorders, Usher syndrome is the most common inherited cause of combined deaf-blindness and accounts for approximately half of all hereditary deaf-blindness cases worldwide (2). Despite advances in neonatal hearing screening, early recognition of Usher syndrome remains challenging because visual manifestations usually develop years after congenital hearing impairment is detected.

Usher syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by varying combinations of sensorineural hearing loss, retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and vestibular dysfunction. Clinically, it is classified into three major subtypes according to the severity and timing of these manifestations. Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1) presents with profound congenital hearing loss, vestibular areflexia, and early-onset RP; USH2 is characterized by congenital moderate-to-severe hearing loss with preserved vestibular function and adolescent-onset RP; whereas USH3 demonstrates progressive post-lingual hearing loss accompanied by variable vestibular and retinal involvement (3,4).

A major diagnostic challenge in Usher syndrome is the asynchronous progression of auditory and visual manifestations. Hearing impairment is typically identified during infancy through newborn hearing screening programs, whereas retinal degeneration remains clinically silent until later childhood or adolescence, when patients develop night blindness, peripheral visual field loss, and progressive visual impairment (2). Consequently, many affected children undergo prolonged audiological rehabilitation without recognition of the underlying syndromic diagnosis, delaying genetic counselling, ophthalmological surveillance, and timely multidisciplinary intervention.

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS), based on automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), has substantially improved the early identification of congenital hearing loss and is now implemented in many healthcare systems worldwide (1). However, these screening programs are designed to detect hearing impairment rather than determine its underlying etiology. As a result, they cannot reliably distinguish isolated nonsyndromic deafness from progressive hereditary syndromes such as Usher syndrome. This limitation contributes to delayed molecular diagnosis, particularly in settings where access to genetic testing and specialized ophthalmic assessment remains limited.

Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have transformed the clinical management of inherited retinal disorders. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) enables comprehensive genetic evaluation of children with unexplained congenital hearing loss, facilitating earlier identification of pathogenic variants associated with Usher syndrome. In parallel, emerging therapeutic strategies—including gene replacement therapy, antisense oligonucleotides, gene-editing technologies, and retinal neuroprotective approaches—have increased the importance of establishing a definitive diagnosis before irreversible photoreceptor degeneration occurs (3). Early molecular diagnosis therefore provides opportunities for personalized clinical management, genetic counselling, timely ophthalmological monitoring, and potential enrollment in gene-based therapeutic trials.

Methods

Protocol and Reporting Guidelines

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) statement to ensure transparent and standardized reporting. The review followed a predefined protocol specifying the research question, eligibility criteria, literature search strategy, study selection process, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis methods.

Research Question

The review addressed the following question:

Among individuals with genetically linked oculo-auditory syndromes, particularly Usher syndrome, how effective are newborn hearing screening, community-based screening, and molecular genetic testing in facilitating early diagnosis compared with conventional symptom-based diagnostic pathways?

PICOS Framework


 
  
   
   Component
   
   
   Description
   
  
  
   
   Population (P)
   
   
   Children and adults with genetically linked oculo-auditory syndromes, particularly Usher syndrome (Types I–III), or congenital sensorineural hearing loss at risk for syndromic disease.
   
  
  
   
   Intervention (I)
   
   
   Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS), automated auditory brainstem response (AABR), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), </p></body>
  <back><ref-list><title>References</title><p>
 Patel H, Feldman M. Universal newborn hearing screening. Paediatr Child Health. 2011;16(5):301-305.
 Toms M, Pagarkar W, Moosajee M. Usher syndrome: Clinical features, molecular genetics and advancing therapeutics. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020;12:2515841420952194.
 Cuzzuol BR, Apolonio JS, da Silva Júnior RT, et al. Usher syndrome: Genetic diagnosis and current therapeutic approaches. World J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;11(1):1-17.
 Koenekoop RK. Usher Syndrome Type I. In: GeneReviews®. University of Washington; 2024.
 Friedman TB, Schultz JM, Ahmed ZM, Tsilou ET, Brewer CC. Usher syndrome: Hearing loss with vision loss. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;70:56-65.
 Jouret G, Poirsier C, Spodenkiewicz M, et al. Genetics of Usher syndrome and advances in molecular diagnosis. Genes (Basel). 2019;10:277.
 Leith L, Lye J, Delaney S, et al. Current approaches for Usher syndrome disease models and developing therapies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025.
 Liu XZ, Yan D. Precision medicine and genetic diagnosis in hereditary hearing loss. Front Genet. 2022;13:843731.
 Manus M, van der Linde J, Kuper H, Olinger R, Swanepoel DW. Community-based hearing and vision screening in schools in low-income communities using mobile health technologies. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2021;52(2):568-580.
 Pierce EA, Bennett J. The status of gene therapy for inherited retinal diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(4):a017301.
 Reiners J, Nagel-Wolfrum K, Jürgens K, Märker T, Wolfrum U. Molecular basis of Usher syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(Suppl 2):R262-R270.
 Sloan-Heggen CM, Bierer AO, Shearer AE, et al. Comprehensive genetic testing in hearing loss using targeted genomic enrichment and massively parallel sequencing. Genet Med. 2016;18(10):972-981.
 World Health Organization. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
 Yan D, Liu XZ, Tekin M. Genetic hearing loss: Current advances in diagnosis and management. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:676891.
 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

</p></ref-list></back>
</article>